![]() |
| Andrew Pope on BBC South Today |
Our co-founder and member of the Independent Network Andrew Pope has published an essay on "immigration".
It is on this page here.
Agree? Disagree? Get in touch.
![]() |
| Andrew Pope on BBC South Today |
Our co-founder and member of the Independent Network Andrew Pope has published an essay on "immigration".
It is on this page here.
Agree? Disagree? Get in touch.
![]() |
| Net Migrants Arrived Minus Prevented in 2024 Source: French Authorities and Home Office and Border Force |
In an exclusive analysis, Southampton Independents can reveal that there have only been just eight weeks since 5th May 2024 where the number of illegal migrants arriving in the UK on small boats has been less than the number prevented from arriving by the French authorities.
This is only eight weeks out of twenty-six, from 5th May 2024 to 27th October 2024.
In every other week, eighteen weeks in total, the number of migrants arriving has exceeded the number of migrants prevented.
The number of migrants arriving is reported by the Home Office and Border Force.
The number of migrants prevented is reported using "operational estimates" provided to the UK Government by French authorities. No prevention figures were available prior to 5th May 2024.
So while the French authorities might be stopping some of the boats, using substantial amounts of UK Government money to do so, other boats are getting through, and as we have reported, the total that have arrived in 2024 now exceeds 30,000.
Prime Minister Starmer has just announced at the Interpol conference in Glasgow that he would be doubling the money given to France to £150 million. So the figures might suggest that it is working, to an extent. There is no doubt that some of the boats are intercepted.
But when the net number of boats is calculated using the same figures, more questions arise.
![]() |
| Net Boats Arrived Minus Prevented in 2024 Source: French Authorities and Home Office and Border Force |
As you can see in the graph above, it appears that there are only three weeks out of twenty-six that more boats arrive than are prevented.
Which then begs the question, how did we get to over 30,000 migrants arriving if these figures are accurate?
And then we might start to question the figures published by the French authorities, the Home Office and Border Force.
Which then leads to questions of trust, already at low levels on this issue.
Perhaps Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron might be discussing the accuracy of the figures during their meeting in Paris following the Armistice Day commemorations today?
Or perhaps they won't...
And this massive failure of successive governments will continue to undermine our country's, and our City's, security and community cohesion.
![]() |
| Illegal Migration Under Tories and Labour in 2024 |
An exclusive analysis by Southampton Independents has shown that Keir Starmer's Labour Government is even worse at preventing illegal migration than "Southampton boy" Rishi Sunak's Tory Government's disastrous failure to "stop the boats".
The graph below shows the number of illegal migrants arriving on small boats per day during 2024, up to 27th October.
![]() |
| Southampton Independents Graph of Illegal Migrants to UK Source: Home Office and Border Force |
When totalled for the periods under Tory and Labour Governments, as shown in the graph below, it is clear that it has got even worse under Labour.
![]() |
| Illegal Migration Under Tories and Labour in 2024 |
(N.B. The resemblance of the graph to the French tricolore is entirely coincidental.)
Far from "smashing the gangs" that Starmer repeatedly promised before July's General Election, the official Government figures that we have analysed show that the number of illegal migrants that have arrived during the Labour Government has now topped 17,000 in just four months, from 5th July to 27th October 2024.
The total number of 17,087 during Starmer's Labour Government far exceeds the 13,574 recorded under Tory Sunak in the six months from 1st January to 4th July 2024. Sunak's record was bad enough and people did not vote Conservative in the General Election because of it. Their votes went elsewhere.
Having plummeted in his approval ratings to be the most unpopular Prime Minister in record time, and with Labour losing the recent Shirley by-election and more by-elections across England and Scotland, Starmer and his hapless Home Secretary Yvette Cooper now appear to be in panic mode.
Starmer has met with "far right" Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, seemingly to get advice on how to deal with illegal migration, which Labour has pathetically rebranded "irregular" migration.
Now the Prime Minister is due to make some new announcements and form new units, in what seems to be a pattern of behaviour of creating units, adding bureaucracy, writing strategies and making public relations announcements that make no difference, yet at the same time declaring "no more gimmicks".
Co-founder of Southampton Independents Andrew Pope, who stood in the recent Shirley by-election as an Independent candidate, says:
![]() |
| Andrew Pope |
"When I stood in the recent Shirley Council by-election, I asked residents what was concerning them. Some residents told me on their doorsteps that they want to know when the boats will be stopped and when our borders will be brought under control.
Residents are concerned about the impact of illegal migration and the out-of-control legal migration on Southampton and our housing, our jobs, our education system, on social care and NHS, and on social integration and cohesion.
They were already concerned before the EU Referendum, when our borders were supposedly to be brought under control - another failure of the Tories.
But now, the impact of migration is bigger... much bigger. It's too much and it's too fast.
I pointed out to those residents that controlled migration can have a positive impact on all of those things, if Government gets a grip and a measure of balance, and communities are given time to adjust. But clearly, that isn't the case.
The Labour-run Council is no help on this issue either.
My investigation and report has shown that just weeks after the General Election, the Labour councillors that run the Council abandoned its 2014 policy of Southampton council housing for Southampton people.
Now they are allowing people who live outside Southampton to get on the waiting list. Officers said they don't even have any record of having rejected any applications from people who did not live in the City.
I fought for the "local connection" policy of a minimum 3 year residency when I was still in the Labour Administration back then. I put it in the Labour Council Manifesto.
Apparently the policy was brought in in 2014 - Council officers confirmed this with copies of the policy - but it has been abandoned at some point during the last ten years. Exactly when is not clear.
I've written to the Housing Cabinet Member Councillor Andy Frampton about the Council's response to my Freedom of Information request, but have received no answer in a fortnight. You would think he would be able to explain.
The Leader of the "opposition" Tories Councillor Peter Baillie has also not replied when I asked him whether he supports the Labour abandonment of the policy.
Local people agreed with me in my conversations with them that on illegal and legal migration, in Government and at the Council, it's another case of Labour or Tory, same old story.
That's why Labour is losing elections across the country and why the Tories have had to elect yet another new Leader after losing the General Election.
Trust and confidence in Government will continue to go down unless these Westminster parties start to control our borders and restore some sense of harmony and balance to society, and to halt the continuing immigration chaos and panic.
Migration can be a positive force but at the moment it is totally out of control."
If you would like to know what support asylum seekers get, you can see it here on the Government gov.uk website. They receive free money, free healthcare, free education and free housing.
| Daily Echo 1st December 2022 |
"11.6 per cent (of Southampton's population) is white" reported the Daily Echo in December 2022
The Southern Daily Echo has apologised for its coverage of the Census for Southampton by the Office for National Statistics.
In a printed article on 1st December 2022, the Southern Daily Echo had previously reported that "11.6 per cent is white" of Southampton's population. Clearly this is false reporting of the facts. Anybody who lives in Southampton would say this is incorrect.
| Daily Echo, p.5 1st Dec 2022 |
The false information appeared under the headline "Census reveals city of diversity" and was front page news under the headline "A REAL MIX - CENSUS DATA REVEALS HOW CITY HAS CHANGED - READ THE FULL REPORT ON PAGE FIVE" with a photo of Southampton's Bargate.
| "11.6 per cent is white" said the Echo |
The article "full report" was in fact only half a page. It also appeared on the Echo website, which we understand has been corrected.
A second article written by another Echo reporter repeated the same misinformation.
Neither article provided any context or explanation for the false claim.
Southampton Independents campaigner and NCTJ-trained journalist Andrew Pope contacted the Editor of the Daily Echo, Ben Fishwick, with a set of concerns about the article's accuracy and how it could be interpreted.
![]() |
| Former Councillor Andrew Pope and our Co-Founder |
Eventually, on 23rd February 2023, almost three months later, the Echo printed the correction, saying that:
"We apologise for the error and are happy to correct the record."
The correction appeared on page 16, in the corner next to an article with headline "Pub set to expand" and above adverts that took up half of the page.
| Daily Echo, 23rd Feb 2023, p. 16 |
| The Correction |
In actual fact, the ONS website clearly states in bold that:
"In 2021, 10.6% of usual residents in Southampton identified their ethnic group within the "Asian, Asian British or Asian Welsh" category"
Coincidence? You decide.
And the ONS site also clearly states that in 2011, that the ethnic group of usual residents was 85.9% white. By 2021, this had decreased to 80.7%.
We will leave you to draw your own conclusions as to how these "errors" were made, but you can see in the photo that the Echo "Correction" states that "the correct figure (of non-white Sotonians) is one in five" - meaning the figure for white Sotonians is four in five - close to the 80.7% white figure above from the ONS.
However, the Echo blames it on third party analysis, saying that:
"This was due to the stories being based in part on third party analysis of Office for National Statistics data".
Yet the ONS itself clearly states the above facts at the above link. We do not have any explanation as to how the ONS analysis could have been missed. We found it immediately using a Google search.
You can decide for yourself why it took so long to correct, and why the mistakes were made in the first place. The Editor of the Echo has been offered the right of reply.
We stand up for Southampton and its residents. That was why we were formed.
![]() |
| We Left The EU Didn't We? |
According to the Government and Members of Parliament, the UK has "left" the EU. Have we noticed? What impact has it had on mass immigration? The Conservatives' version of "Brexit" does not seem to match what people voted for in 2016.
Before the 2016 EU Referendum, people were promised that the UK would "take back control" of our borders.
Yet statistics published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show the:
"highest net migration since the Second World War and is far higher than pre-Brexit levels."
And it is the same old story with our economy as well as mass immigration, with Labour or Conservative governments "in control" (except they haven't been in control as it's been repeated failure and chaos):
It doesn't seem to matter who is in Government, it is the people of Southampton who suffer.
Here is what the Southampton Independents candidate for Southampton Test at the 2017 General Election, Andrew Pope said at the time.
![]() |
| Former Councillor Andrew Pope |
Andrew was not elected, but he listened to what the people of Southampton said, and represented their views.
So what about the current MPs for Southampton? There are three.
Have these Labour and Tory MPs represented you?
They have not respected the vote at the 2016 EU Referendum.
These MPs and their Westminster parties have done very little to bring mass immigration under control. If they have done anything, it has not worked.
It's more Labour or Tory and the same old story.
Who do they represent? Because it does not seem to be the people of Southampton, or the views of the people of Southampton at Westminster.
These MPs put themselves and their parties first.
![]() |
| Will Brexit fix schools? |
![]() |
| Labour's Wilted Rose |
"Immigration needs to be controlled if Southampton is going to get a grip on class sizes and the funding crisis. It isn't an opinion. It is a simple fact.
All of this time, Alan Whitehead has been the Labour MP for Southampton Test. What has he done about it? Very little and if he has done anything, the schools are still struggling.
People tell us that it is time for Alan Whitehead to go. He has had plenty of opportunities to fix Southampton's schools. But he has flunked the examination over 20 years. Alan Whitehead even voted against Brexit. How is that going to fix our schools?
The Tory candidate Paul Holmes says he was Cabinet Member for schools, back at the beginning of this decade. Did he fix the crisis? No. Where has he been since then? In London.
Please vote for me to replace Alan Whitehead and be your Southampton Independents MP. I will get to the bottom of the schools problems and fight effectively to sort them out."
![]() |
| Soton Indies Official Party Emblem |
| Andrew Pope |