Search This Website Here

Showing posts with label bus passes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bus passes. Show all posts

Tuesday, 21 February 2023

Southampton City Council Wants You To "Celebrate" The Demise of City Reds Buses - And Nobody Wants To Mention The "M" Word


Southampton City Council
Facebook Page

"We have no current plans to increase fares but we must be mindful of the increase in our own costs due to the current high level of inflation" say Bluestar

by Andrew D Pope, 21st February 2023


Southern Daily Echo
"Fares will not be increased"

UPDATE (25/2/23): Neither Councillor Eamonn Keogh, nor Conservative Group of councillors, nor Liberal Democrat councillor, nor Bluestar have responded to our request for comment. We did ask.

The Labour-run Southampton City Council has asked members of the public to celebrate a "new dawn", in the almost Maoist China sense, of a monopoly in buses in Southampton, by going along for a photo opportunity at the Bargate. Yes, that's right, Southampton now has a monopoly for buses with City Reds going under.

Just a day before this "celebration", Labour Councillor Eamonn Keogh who is the Cabinet Member responsible for transport in Southampton, spoke on the Council's Youtube channel from Vincents Walk, near to the Bargate. Councillor Keogh that it was a "sad day" that City Reds had gone, but "fortunately" Bluestar would help bring "innovative" buses to the City. Opposition councillors from the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have been asked to comment. Councillor Keogh has also been asked for a response. There are currently no independent councillors.


What is a Monopoly and Why Should I Care?

A monopoly is when one company is the only one providing a product or service. In the UK, monopolies are supposed to be regulated and prevented by the Competition and Markets Authority. But not it seems, when it comes to Southampton's buses. Perhaps buses are exempt from competition? But not according the records of the CMA because previous investigations have been undertaken in other parts of England. And various Government guidance has been issued, for example here.

Monopolies are regulated because according to economists who believe in economic theory, and they would say that significant evidence supports the theory, monopolies can abuse their position. Customers can suffer, suppliers can suffer, prices can go up. Nobody can go to a competitor, simply because there are none. Whether this will happen with Southampton's buses remains to be seen. What is the difference between centralised state control, for example in China or the Soviet Union, and a monopoly run by an exclusive company?

Contrary to what many people believe, Southampton City Council does not own or run Southampton's buses. As I discovered when as a City Councillor I ran an Inquiry, and produced a City Council report, into buses and sustainable transport at Southampton General Hospital, the Council subsidises some routes ran by commercial bus operators with public money. Buses used to be run by councils, but that was a long time ago before they were privatised by the Conservative Government.

Now there is no market for buses. Passengers cannot choose between competing bus providers. It is now a monopoly. So what are the differences between public ownership in a monopoly and private ownership in a monopoly? Southampton passengers are about to find out.


City Reds Is Dead and Bluestar Is Now The Only Southampton Bus Company 

Yet despite its new dawn of a monopoly, Bluestar has not commented on the monopoly position that they now enjoy, despite being asked directly by me. Bluestar's parent company Go South Coast have also taken over other bus services in the South and West of England, when competitors have gone bust. 

When it became clear that City Reds was going to disappear, in January 2023 I contacted Go South Coast's Managing Director Andrew Wickham, whom I had observed praising Southampton City Council and other Council's policies on Twitter. This is strange behaviour for the managing director of a bus company. Mr Wickham has also backed the very unpopular Portswood Broadway closure being promoted by the Labour-run Council, in an email response to Southampton Independents.


Are Local Media Asking The Right Questions?

Nobody seemed to be asking the questions that concern consumers in a monopoly - and in this case let's call them passengers. If local media were asking, the answers did not seem to be being covered in a big way by local media outlets. Of course, any advertising revenue received from Bluestar would not tarnish the editorial or journalistic decisions by those outlets. Surely, those media outlets would always provide impartial and clear information for Southampton residents, regardless of the advertising revenue. 

The demise of City Reds has been covered, but the new monopoly has not. The word monopoly was not used in the above article in the Daily Echo (see top of article). Neither does another recent Echo article. And this BBC article, despite the BBC not being a commercial news organisation does not mention the "M" word either! So much for journalism in Southampton? According to the Press Gazette, a recent BBC review of economics coverage found a lack of knowledge and impartiality, so perhaps it is not surprising.

The Bluestar media release to local media outlets may have been caused by the questions that I asked them and not by any questions raised by the Daily Echo.  Indeed, the article above reads like a press release. I have asked Bluestar's PR agency.


Will Prices Go Up and Will Services Be Cut?

I asked Mr Wickham about Bluestar's new monopoly position in Southampton, with the question:

"What would your company say to passengers and citizens of our City to assuage any concerns that Bluestar might abuse its monopoly position?"

You may notice in his response below that Mr Wickham does not really answer my question on the monopoly. He does not even mention the monopoly but he does mention the demise of City Reds (First Bus). And he does not rule out price rises. You can draw your own conclusions from his response. 

"My team has worked hard to ensure people living and working in the area will continue to enjoy comprehensive bus services here from Sunday 19 February. We are also offering employment to existing Southampton First Bus drivers - with improved pay and conditions - to minimise the impact this decision could have on their livelihoods.

Our investment in a fleet of low emissions buses in the city means those who travel with us enjoy comfortable, convenient, journeys across Southampton - and we are looking forward to welcoming new customers over the coming months. I can assure local people that we will continue to look for ways to improve our offering here. 

We have no current plans to increase fares but we must be mindful of the increase in our own costs due to the current high level of inflation, so we will be monitoring this situation continuously and will react accordingly."

Bluestar has been receiving Government subsidies for fares. This will end. Will prices go up then? Will services be cut? Time will tell, especially when the City Council's celebration at the Bargate fades into irrelevance.

What do you think? Get in touch and tell us.




Monday, 25 April 2016

Southampton Labour Is Ashamed of Its Failures

Over the last four years since they made the promises that they didn't keep, Southampton Labour have been increasingly ashamed of their failures to protect the vulnerable.

What Jeremy Corbyn claims Labour does ("Labour is standing up for your community") is far from the reality of what Southampton Labour has done on Southampton City Council.

It's no wonder very respected election expert Prof John Curtice is predicting a very poor Labour performance, including the loss of control of Southampton on May 5th. They only have a majority of 2 (25 Labour 20 Conservatives 3 Independents).

This is because Labour has not PROTECTED but ATTACKED your community with inappropriate developments and cuts!

Labour are still trying to blame others like the Tories - who also failed when they were in power from 2008-2012.

But Labour has chosen the wrong priorities, wasted millions due to their serial incompetence and has seen a revolving door of failure at Southampton City Council.

All the while they claimed that they didn't have the money to keep services and do the Millbrook and Maybush Regeneration, despite wasting millions on the Arts Complex - and now Labour Leader Councillor Simon Letts wants to borrow £65 million - after cutting all these services and claiming there is no money/blaming the Tories for the umpteenth time!

It's an outrage - but it's typical Labour incompetence. How many Labour Governments have left our country in a financial mess? And now Labour wants to risk YOUR money on so-called "investment". As they say on TV, investments can go down as well as up - this is taxpayers' money - YOUR money!

And what of Redbridge ward - has your Redbridge Labour Councillor Lee Whitbread protected the vulnerable? No.

Even though he is seeking your vote, Lee Whitbread (have you even heard of him before now?) and the Labour Council have failed to protect YOU, your family and your area.

Lee Whitbread voted:
  • to cut YOUR lollipop men and women
  • to cut YOUR Sure Start services
  • to cut YOUR library and bus passes
  • to close Woodside Lodge and Brownhill House care centres

Labour uses weasel words and deception to deny the truth.

But the truth is there on public record in the agenda and minutes of the Council.

Or perhaps Labour councillors didn't even know what they were doing when they were voting these cuts through? Did they read the budget? Did they read the reports to Council? Did the Cabinet sneak the cuts through?

It doesn't matter - the facts are there. They voted for more and more cuts.

The truth is that there is no real difference between Labour and the Tories - they both have cut YOUR services.

Lee Whitbread hasn't properly represented you. He didn't stand up for YOU to have your say at the Regeneration public meeting. He has failed to defend your area from inappropriate developments.

Vote for Independent Denise Wyatt to replace him.

Sunday, 10 April 2016

Denise Wyatt - Your Redbridge Independent Council Candidate

Denise Wyatt Your Independent Council Candidate listens to YOU.

You told her Labour's Regeneration ignored you. Denise spoke up for you to have your say at the public meeting at All Saints Church. Independent councillors speak up for you instead of doing what their party tells them to like Labour, Tory and UKIP.

Denise fought for you against Labour Council cuts at Windermere Avenue Sure Start, Labour Council cuts to Millbrook Library, Labour and Tory plans to cut disabled and pensioner bus passes and Labour closure of Woodside Lodge and Brownhill House care centres.

Denise fought for more parking and fought against and changed bad developments like the Test Lane monstrosities and the Council in-filling of our green spaces and parks.

Denise says:
"I have and will put the people of Redbridge first because as an Independent I can! As Independent councillors do in Redbridge and Coxford, I focus on representing my local community – NOT jumping to political party instruction!"
Vote Denise Wyatt on Thursday 5th May - or in your postal vote!


Vote for Independents!

Monday, 4 January 2016

Paying for Free Bus Passes? You must be joking...

Happy New Year to all my readers and your friends and families!

Labour and Tory councillors from Southampton and Hampshire have "agreed" that pensioners paying for free bus passes is a good idea. This follows the disastrous decision by the Labour Council, slipped in under the radar during budget cuts, to cut disabled bus passes - much to local people's dismay - and that of Unite Community.

I'm not joking about this! It just isn't funny.

Yes, minutes of the Council scrutiny meeting show (quoted below) that the current Labour Leader of Southampton City Council Councillor Letts* and Leader of the Conservative Group Councillor Moulton think that free bus passes should actually not mean free travel! When I asked them, the Southampton Labour Group of councillors confirmed they know about the proposal. Yet they have not stopped it! 

* (He whom I have regularly publicly criticised, following my rejection last May of his offer for me to join his failing Cabinet of cuts. I chose in favour of standing up for the people of Redbridge against this Council's cuts.)

"The Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee expressed support for outline proposals relating to the pensioner bus pass scheme, discussed at the meeting, where potentially a nominal charge might be introduced to enhance the sustainability of services."

Here is further evidence of their bonkers bus buffoonery, quoted from p.29 of the Devolution Prospectus for Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, a mostly vague document that apparently has been fully signed-up-to by leaders of councils across the area:

"... A recent Hampshire County Council consultation on bus subsidy reductions indicated that concessionary passholders would potentially be happy to contribute to the cost of their journeys if that directly supported wider availability of bus services that they could use.
What HIOW will do - Establish a new local bus fund hypothecated to supporting socially necessary bus services, with emphasis on evening, weekend and weekday access in areas where the commercial service is very limited.
What we ask in return - Localise the national Concessionary Fares scheme in HIOW to support a new fund for wider bus service subsidies in areas where the commercial service is very limited."
Let me know what you think of this idea!

At the Extraordinary Council Meeting just before Christmas, I voted against the current plans for English devolution - and for those currently involved to continue to negotiate on "our" behalves.

This form of Tory Devolution, that Labour are going along with, is just wrong. They need to start again with the public properly involved. Surveys have shown that the public are not aware, or do not care, about devolution. But decisions are being taken in their name, without their permission.

This crazy proposal for bus passes shows how out-of-touch these "leaders" are, and how much they've got it wrong. 

I hear that even the Minister Greg Clark is unimpressed by the Hampshire proposals, and has asked for them to be improved!

It also shows that the people of Southampton deserve better councillors - in contrast to asleep-at-the-wheel Southampton Labour councillors, the Basingstoke Labour councillors don't support the bus pass idea. You can see them say it on Youtube here. In Southampton, these failing Labour councillors must be voted out in this May's local elections.

Andrew.